Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 1:15:09 GMT -5
Ain criminal justice processes. This implies among other things that the police do not unduly interfere in their work nor subject them to any form of intimidation or coercion. In addition the police will not make an association between defense lawyers and their clients. Support from the police regarding the criminals right to legal assistance is necessary especially when the person concerned is deprived of liberty by the police. RIGHT I. Regarding the alleged violation of art. of the Convention . The applicant claims in particular that he was illtreated by a police officer while representing a client as a lawyer during a criminal investigation and complains that an effective investigation was.
Not carried out by the authorities authorities following Country Email List his criminal complaint against the said policeman. He invokes art. and of the Convention. The Court responsible for the legal framing of the facts finds that these claims are confused and considers it appropriate to examine the plaintiffs accusations only from the perspective of art. of the Convention which is formulated as follows No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. A. Regarding admissibility . The Court notes that this claim is not manifestly unfounded within the.
Meaning of art. lit. a from the Convention and that it does not present any other reason for inadmissibility. He therefore declares it admissible. B. On the merits . Regarding the material aspect of art. a Arguments of the parties . The complainant did not submit observations on this point but presented in the application form. . Referring to the Case of Klaas v. Germany September Series A no. the Government asserts that the applicants allegations are not supported by adequate evidence. He believes that the applicant was not subjected to illtreatment by state agents. He admits that the applicant.
Not carried out by the authorities authorities following Country Email List his criminal complaint against the said policeman. He invokes art. and of the Convention. The Court responsible for the legal framing of the facts finds that these claims are confused and considers it appropriate to examine the plaintiffs accusations only from the perspective of art. of the Convention which is formulated as follows No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. A. Regarding admissibility . The Court notes that this claim is not manifestly unfounded within the.
Meaning of art. lit. a from the Convention and that it does not present any other reason for inadmissibility. He therefore declares it admissible. B. On the merits . Regarding the material aspect of art. a Arguments of the parties . The complainant did not submit observations on this point but presented in the application form. . Referring to the Case of Klaas v. Germany September Series A no. the Government asserts that the applicants allegations are not supported by adequate evidence. He believes that the applicant was not subjected to illtreatment by state agents. He admits that the applicant.
Im doing better. How are you? 
If you guys see Kitty, can you tell her that i miss her. lol 
I do want to play FP will all of you again...Kitty, Vee, JR, Mel, and Nicole....i forgot Nicole's username. Anyway's, TELL ME SOMETHING. lol 
I hope you guys still had fun. Im not in a good place right now. My sister thinks im bi polar and she is convincing me im right. And ugh i hate it. I don't think i am...im just stressed at stupid things.